Mississippi court enjoins H-2A worker protection rule nationwide
Injunction issued by U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi enjoins components of H-2A worker protection rule nationwide
An attempt by the U.S. Department of Labor to provide protections to H-2A workers who organize to form labor unions has been dealt its biggest blow since its challenged implementation in April.
A preliminary injunction issued late last month by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi enjoins components of the rule addressing labor organization and labor rights nationwide.
Previous rulings in Georgia and Kentucky had stayed the rule in 21 states which had filed suit, along with members of five agricultural associations.
The International Fresh Produce Association (IFPA) filed suit in Mississippi on Oct. 8. Co-plaintiffs included the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the state of Mississippi, the American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF), AmericanHort, the North American Blueberry Council (NABC) and the U.S. Apple Association.
U.S. District Judge Halil Suleyman Ozerden wrote in the stay (.pdf), filed Nov. 25, that the court was “persuaded by the State’s argument that because it must expend resources to ensure compliance with the H-2A program’s requirements, it will be irreparably harmed by the challenged provisions.”
The rule, “Improving Protections for Workers in Temporary Agricultural Employment in the United States,” shielded migrant workers with H-2A temporary work visas who organize to form labor unions and against wage theft and trafficking. It took effect in June.
In September, U.S. District Judge Lisa Godbey Wood in Georgia enjoined the rule from being enforced in 17 states that filed suit. In November, U.S. District Judge Danny Reeves’ ruling extended the injunction to Alabama, Kentucky, Ohio and West Virginia and members of five associations, including the National Council of Agricultural Employees and the Worker and Farm Labor Association.
The judges found that the rule violates the National Labor Relations Act, which excludes farmworkers from collective bargaining rights. The Labor Department argued in Mississippi that the rule did not violate the NLRA but expanded the H-2A program’s existing anti-discrimination provisions.
IFPA and its co-plaintiffs contended that the rule was unconstitutional and beyond the Labor Department’s statutory authority, imposing unlawful demands on agricultural employers and creating disruption across the farming industry.
“This ruling is a victory for farmers and the agricultural community nationwide,” IFPA CEO Cathy Burns said in a statement. “The stay prevents a regulatory overreach that would increase costs and inefficiencies while imposing unconstitutional restrictions on employers. By granting this relief, the court ensures that farmers can focus on producing the fresh fruits and vegetables our communities depend on to live healthful lives.”
U.S. District Judge Halil Suleyman Ozerden wrote in the stay (.pdf), filed Nov. 25, that the court was “persuaded by the State’s argument that because it must expend resources to ensure compliance with the H-2A program’s requirements, it will be irreparably harmed by the challenged provisions.”
The rule, “Improving Protections for Workers in Temporary Agricultural Employment in the United States,” shielded migrant workers with H-2A temporary work visas who organize to form labor unions and against wage theft and trafficking. It took effect in June.
In September, U.S. District Judge Lisa Godbey Wood in Georgia enjoined the rule from being enforced in 17 states that filed suit. In November, U.S. District Judge Danny Reeves’ ruling extended the injunction to Alabama, Kentucky, Ohio and West Virginia and members of five associations, including the National Council of Agricultural Employees and the Worker and Farm Labor Association.
The judges found that the rule violates the National Labor Relations Act, which excludes farmworkers from collective bargaining rights. The Labor Department argued in Mississippi that the rule did not violate the NLRA but expanded the H-2A program’s existing anti-discrimination provisions.

IFPA CEO Cathy Burns

